Policy Memo
Topline
Rent control and eviction moratoria shrink the supply of rental housing, deter new construction and upkeep, and erode fundamental private property rights. Lawmakers at every level should reject these price and occupancy controls.
Affordability 101 · Chapter 4: Freedom to Build
Plymouth Institute for Free Enterprise
Rent control and eviction moratoria shrink the supply of rental housing, deter new construction and upkeep, and erode fundamental private property rights. Lawmakers at every level should reject these price and occupancy controls.
Rental costs rose roughly 51% over the past decade, outpacing overall inflation. Laws that artificially depress rents, impede evictions, and handcuff property managers do nothing to solve the affordable housing problem. When cities like Portland, New York City, and San Francisco adopt such policies, they deter construction of new units and can leave renters stuck in more dilapidated conditions as landlords have less incentive to spend on upkeep and remodeling.
Economist Assar Lindbeck once cautioned, “In many cases rent control appears to be the most efficient technique presently known to destroy a city—except for bombing.” Vietnam’s leadership linked the abject condition of Hanoi’s housing in 1989 to rent control. Then-Foreign Minister Nguyen Co Thach said, “The Americans couldn’t destroy Hanoi, but we have destroyed our city by very low rents.”
Rent control and eviction moratoria have failed where they’ve been tried. Policymakers should learn from these mistakes and reject these controls.
This memo is part of Affordability 101, Advancing American Freedom’s playbook of 101 policy solutions to make life more affordable.