Policy Memo
Topline
Policymakers should eliminate or relax licensure laws and other government-imposed barriers to entry that limit competition.
Affordability 101 · Chapter 3: Freedom to Work and Enterprise
Plymouth Institute for Free Enterprise
Policymakers should eliminate or relax licensure laws and other government-imposed barriers to entry that limit competition.
In theory, licensure laws protect the public from unqualified or unscrupulous practitioners. In practice, many state licensure schemes act as cartels that protect incumbents from competition. In 1950, only about 5% of workers needed an occupational license; today, it’s 22%. Licensure laws are especially harmful to younger and lower-income individuals and the more than one in four American adults who have a criminal record that can disqualify them from many licenses. Requiring people to pay hefty fees and attend dozens or hundreds of hours of training before they can legally become barbers, bartenders, ballroom dance instructors, florists, or hair braiders needlessly limits work and income opportunities. By restricting the supply of workers, licensure laws drive up the costs of goods and services, and studies consistently find that the higher prices and limited employment come with little or no measurable improvement in quality or public safety. On an annual basis, occupational licensing is estimated to cost about 1.85 million jobs and about $193 billion in misallocated resources.
Related State Legislation: Occupational Licensing, Reciprocity (Arizona H.B. 2569 [2019], enacted [the first universal license recognition law]); Occupational Freedom and Opportunity Act (Florida H.B. 1193 [2020], enacted [most comprehensive licensure reform]).
Competition—not licensure cartels—is the best protection for consumers. Governments should remove barriers to work instead of creating them.
This memo is part of Affordability 101, Advancing American Freedom’s playbook of 101 policy solutions to make life more affordable.